My Australia Day

Today is Thursday, January 26, 2012. This day is Australia Day and a national holiday- that is of course unless you happen to work in retail or emergency services - in honor of our first settlement in 1788 and subsequent founding as a nation that has come to be known as Australia. We are an island continent, that is, an island so large as to rate the status of continent and we are about the same size as the continental United States. We mainly occupy the coastal fringe areas of our land which is condusive to growing good food and to providing a healthy, but at times very warm climate. The interior of our land is mostly uninhabited - apart from some isolated Towns and is mainly desert, to which only the 'Noble Savage' occupies in preference to becoming' modernized' - where vast tracts of land, larger than some European countries, are utilized as sheep and cattle 'Stations.'

Our continent has a perimeter which contains fourteen thousand kilometers of white sandy beaches, only some of those beaches are utilized used for swimming or surfing purposes. During the months of May, June, July and August - Australian wintertime - one may travel to tropical Queensland for a surf, or a swim, or jump a plane and fly into Thredbo, Mt. Hotham or other towns in the 'Australian Alps' to do some snowboarding or skiing. Australian's generally lead a very comfortable lifestyle which is equal to, or better than most other nations of similar population which is currently 22 million souls. Australia has a population made up of representatives from nearly all the nations on Earth which has made us one of the most successful immigrant accepting nations of all time.

You will then understand why I wish to protect what we have so far produced out of a barren continent against those who believe that the modern Australia is something to be ashamed of and to be denigrated while they promote their own elitist ideals, which only those affected by a lack of common sense, blinded by ideology, or hatred of their own kind can appreciate. I refer of course to those who sit in 'high' places and deign to pass judgement on their fellow Australians on their national day and choose to denigrate our history, our Australian values, customs and traditions, as not being worthy of their 'level' of intellectual ability because the average Australian refuses to see, let alone value, the same idealist principles and degenerative thinking.

I now refer you to one Peter Gebhardt who is a former County Court judge and will ask you, the reader, to take in what Gebhardt has written and then ask yourself this simple question; do we really want people of Gebhardt's intellect to be sitting in judgement on ordinary Australians?

From the Age Newspaper;

Australia Day is, of course, an artificial fabrication designed by goverments, the corporate world, media, Australia Day Councils and smug Anglo-Saxons to ensure that we forget real history.
That Anglo-Saxon smugness is a resilient child of hypocrisy and racism. The mawkish jingoism, the noisy triumphalism and trumped up nationalism lead to xenophobia that treats our humanity as something special and beyond the humanity of others who are not of these shores, or of those, the original owners, who live within our shores, but have been relegated as relics of history, beyond imagination.

The Idiots in charge of the Military

I have been reading with some amusement the latest 'outrage' as portrayed by the media against their favorite target, the American Military, or any Western military for that matter, where a small number of American soldiers, who have been identified as Marines, who are probably the best of the bunch, have been videoed while they urinated on the bodies of three Taliban insurgents. Tut, tut boys! While that video should never have been taken and its exposure so readily displays the naivety of the troops who decided to participate in this incident, the media and those who control our militaries also deserve a sharp reality check. Those who now declare this incident as 'deplorable' as the Chief of the CIA, Leon Panetta has so readily provided in a grovelling phone call to the Afghan president, that speaker with forked tongue, Hamid Karzai, a so called 'trusted ally' who only recently stated that Afghanistan would readily side with Pakistan if America invaded that country, just goes to expose the hypocrisy that is running like an uncontrolled dose of diarrhrea throughout ALL western governments.

But now, because a few soldiers were silly enough to allow themselves to be recorded doing what soldiers have done since time immemorial, and that is, to relieve their pent up tension and hate that comes with fighting an enemy, who only moments before was trying to kill them, by displaying their prowess and disrepect for their enemy through an act designed to make them feel better while boosting their morale. And that self proclaimed 'progressive' Hilary Rodham Clinton is on the record as quoting in regard to this incident, "Anyone found to have participated must be held fully accountable". I say, accountable for what exactly Hilary? Was anyone offended here? Is she speaking for the dead Taliban?; who in all probability would have done far worse to the American Marines that did the urinating if they had been captured or killed. Or maybe she is speaking up for the living relatives of the Taliban who would not even be aware of this incident if it had been kept out of the anti-Western, Western media, and not played for propaganda value by those who believe they ride a very high horse when it comes to issues of the mistreatment of dead enemy combatants that the troops of the West are forced to kill. And is urinating on your dead enemy really mistreating the body? Or, is the spectre of Marines exercising their pent up rage against those enemy who, if they had won the fight, would have enjoyed torturing the Marines to death, or mutilating their dead bodies by using far worse instruments than urine more offensive than what could have happened to those Marines if they had been captured? And speaking of the Marines golden shower to three dead Taliban, shouldn't we be appreciating the fact that those ragged Taliban from the most unhygenic of the worlds population have at least been given a wash? Really, is the action of those Marines something we should really feel ashamed of?

Only in the West does the military have a charge aimed at 'the desecration of enemy bodies' that can be used against its troops. Talk about a morale buster! If troops are no longer able to alleviate the stress of battle by even pissing on their vanquished foe then how is the single soldier able to cope with the 'fog of war' which those who make these rules up will never have to face?

The Taliban is an enemy who tortures in extremis before killing their prisoner, that is if the prisoner survives the torture, and then mutilates what is left of their body. Just ask the many Russian soldiers who had the misfortune of retrieving their dead comrades from what was then called 'mujhadin' camp sites. The Mujhadin morphed into the Taliban after seeing off the Russians and is an enemy that treats their own kind with so little consideration that killing children and women is par the course of being in the Taliban. The Taliban is an enemy who grooms young boys for sexual pleasure, but who will kill the adult male recognized as a homosexual because the Qu'ran says that it must be so. The Taliban is an enemy not worthy of being included in the Geneva Convention which still overrides Western military prisoner treatment because the Geneva Convention is a document for honorable warring sides to emulate and the Taliban is anything but honorable. If I had been one of those soldiers who are now under investigation for 'crimes against humanity' I too would have urinated on those dead Taliban because it would have made me feel better!

Perhaps all those who scream the loudest about this incident should avail themselves of a military uniform and equipment, the Clintons, the Panettas, the Western media, the Lawyers and the armchair moralists, and then go to Afghanistan and show us all how it should be done! Hypocrites! The lot of 'em!

Who are the real extremists?

According to the Macquarie Encyclopedic Dictionary the word extremism is described as such;  a tendency or disposition to go to extremes, esp. in political matters. - extremist, Noun.
.
So, to label someone as an extremist is to label them as a person who does extreme things which are  outside normal societal standards, or in the poltical sense, professes to have views that are at the further ends of both the right and the left of the political spectrum. But what is the political spectrum?
.
If you were to draw a straight line across a blank page and fill from the left to right to the center with the following;
.
Totalitarianism, Oligarchies, Monarchies, Dictatorships,Communism/Socialism, National Socialism, Social Democracy. You would then have all those political systems that are and will forever remain, left of center on the political spectrum, the political ideal of Socialism filling half of those places.
.
If you then continued onto the center, being neither left nor right, and placed Conservatism as occupying the central spot and then continued onto the right side you would next add the American Republic, and further along to the right extreme, Anarchy.
.
You would now have the political spectrum as understood by those who are politically astute. You will also note that at either end of the spectrum, there is on the extreme left, Totalitarianism, or total control of the populace by a centralized government which does not recognize or condone any opposition to its control as compared to the extreme right wing of Anarchy, or a state of society without any government or law.
.
Why is it then that groups such as the English Defence League (EDL), or the British National Party(BNP), are continually labelled by the main stream media (MSM) as being of the 'extreme far Right Wing?' Both these groups, who are largely nationalist in makeup, are not promoting a society that is not ruled by law as is suggested by the phrase, 'far right wing', and merely advocate that certain cultures are not compatible within a traditional Christian Judeo based British nation.
.
For those of you who do not know their recent history, the larger part of the Twentieth Century was taken up in fighting wars against socialism in its many forms. Hitler, Stalin, Mao are all products of Socialism in one form or another, and as you can see from the political spectrum, they are therefore by definition, creatures of the Left.
.
If you the reader were asked to choose the best political system in which to grow and prosper without undue interference by an elected government, which system would you choose?
.
Would you choose to be ruled over and have very little say, or none at all, in how you go about your life, or would you choose a system that guarantees freedom from tyranny and liberty to all who wish to make their own choices in life? Would you choose a system that totally rules over you or a system that allows you choices under a government that is demanded by law to stay out of your life?
.
Do you the reader believe that both the EDL and the BNP occupy an extremist political position? Or do you believe that those who can see the dismantling of their nation and speak up to defend it are being victimized by the MSM and a certain Elite who have contrived to erase what was once a wholly white British nation?
.
So, I now ask you the reader this question, who are the real extremists?

On Racism

Watching the antics between the European Leaders, and the British Prime Minister, at their recent meeting to salvage what is left of a rapidly disintegrating European Union and its single currency, the Euro, I was left with an impression that by prodding with some extra thinking eventually turned into this post.
.
The impression I was left with and that has now spurred me on to write about, is simply this; racism is colorblind! That is, one does not necessarily have to base a racist attitude on the color of the 'others' skin, rather the racist attitude is developed through observation about a particular culture and the many differences of that culture as compared to the one the observer has grown up in. Let me explain:
.
We can all see with our eyes firmly open the obvious differences between a Negro and a White man, differences which today have been made taboo to publicly discuss for fear of expressing racist sentiments. This is absurd! This is like saying that when black man meets white man that the obvious differences in facial aspects as well as skin color is not to be noticed. Not to be noticed? Really? Are we then supposed to conduct any meaningful dialog with each with our eyes shut? It is one of our basic instincts that we notice obvious differences, this then allows us to become discerning, that is, we are then able to register mentally if the obvious difference that others display are going to be beneficial or dangerous to us. This is a normal human trait that multiculturalists would rather that you suppress. To be able to discern danger, or dangerous behaviour, is a safety instinct in us that provides an early warning that something about those being observed is wrong and the observer should remain on guard. To deny this simple human trait is to deny the basic functions that have been built into us for our own survival. Without our basic instincts on which to act, we may as well just lock ourselves away in some kind of Zoo, so that we may be looked at and pitied by other more intelligent beings who are willing, able to use, and act on their own basic instincts.
.
We are after all just very intelligent animals who have never lost the basic will for survival. To deny this as part of our human experience is to deny life itself and should never have become interwoven into Multicultural legislation that is the complete antithesis to what our basic instincts and observational skills tell us. Humanity is divided into cultures of various colors, and those cultures into tribes which is so diverse in how those cultures go about their daily lives that any truthful observer, and one untainted by the doctrine of Multiculturalism, can't help but come to the conclusion that some cultures will always clash with other cultures. It's even written about in history books for those who wish to avail themselves of real human history, and not that as is presented today by the Multiculturalist's and their fellow travellers.
.
Returning to that meeting in Europe, what impressed me most was the cultural differences, even though they are only small, of all the players at that meeting. And while all the players are white caucasian, the little differences between each others cultures are now coming to the fore. The Germans are now demanding, the French are feigning indignity, while the other smaller cultures of Europe are seeking revenge for Britain's 'NO' to a new treaty. It is becoming racist in projection even though all the players are the same color!
.
So the next time that someone tells you to your face that you are racist simply because you have observed a particular culture as being unable to fit into your own culture, due to the obvious differences, tell them to go to Hell as your attitude has nothing to do with the color of their skin, or how they look, but is based upon your obsevations, and it is their behaviour that alerts you to the fact that they just don't fit in.

On Same Sex Marriage.

What is it with Leftards and homosexual marriage? What drives their desire even though most of them are not homosexual, to enforce societal changes onto the rest of us who could care less about the sexual lifestyles of Homosexuals, let alone their preference to legitimize their abnormal relationships. And please do not tell me that sticking a male's Penis into a male's Anus, or for that matter a woman's Anus, is normal? I think not! The Anus has only one purpose in life, which to those of us who wish to retain a healthy lifestyle use from time to time to be rid of unwanted, but very smelly baggage. That simple fact alone should be a sufficient deterent for any man, well at least those who consider themselves to be men, to keep their pleasure stick out of smelly dirty holes. And by a male substituting his Anus for that of a female Vagina for the use of by another male - well isn't that an admission by the practising homosexual that they are simply acting out the role of  the woman in the relationship, which in my humble opinion, and by such practice, is general recognition of the womans role in society, especially when it comes to marriage. Therefore, to label the homosexual relationship as 'normal' and again in my humble opinion, is the blatant misuse of the word normal.
. 
Obviously some homosexual men and women out there, and who, thankfully, are a small minority, are sexually confused about their role in life and would rather set up house, or establish a relationship with similar confused males and females. Well that's fine by me so long as they keep their lifestyle where it belongs, at home and not out on the streets trying to convince the rest of us of just how 'normal' they really are. Of effeminate men and blokey woman there is no doubt, but this type of 'obvious' abnormality in the male and female is a very small part of the minority that consider themselves as homosexuals, because most homosexuals are 'made.' That is, a perfect heterosexual child is groomed by circumstance to be attracted to the same gender. Whether those who have been 'trained' this way have been the victim of a deliberate or accidental arrangement is a matter that only they will know, and this grooming can be reversed by some psychiatrists, but, it is when this fact becomes apparent to those who practice what nature intended, that the activities by the homosexual lobby should ring alarm bells! Those parents who wish their children a balanced education should be very wary of the agenda that is being pushed by the Leftists and homosexual lobby into kindergarten and primary schools with a view to 'legitimizing' homosexual behaviour through 'sensitivity training' which has  nothing to do with preaching normal behaviour as any loving parent would understand.
.
The homosexual appears to be normal in every aspect of modern life but, when it comes to the bedroom what they regard as having sex, is anything but normal!
.
Would you as a loving parent like to have your child indoctrinated by those who consider the homosexual lifestyle normal and comparable with any heterosexual person, or would you rather your child learned about homosexuality as an abnormality, which it is, and to be treated as simply an abnormal sexual behaviour within a very small minority group of society? There can be nothing 'normal' about the sexual practises within the homosexual population when the vast majority of the society that minority group belongs to adhere to sexual practices as nature intended.
.
Who would have guessed that de-criminalizing homosexuality some decades ago, and in all its colors, would lead to a future push by these same self styled 'normal' people to impose their brand of  'normality' onto the rest of us through legislation designed to alter the Australian Marriage Act to include same sex couples? The recent Labor Party conference has endorsed same sex marriage, and which I have no doubt, will early next year be presented as a Bill on conscience vote. I believe this Bill will pass both houses and be made into law. The same political party which made its reputation defending the Australian worker and upholding Australian culture and morals is now assisting in dividing a nation by imposing legislation which would be defeated by the people if given a chance in a referendum. And to have this legislation imposed by an un-elected and therefore illegitimate Federal Government, is a very big pill to swallow!
.
I'm sure that the founders of this once great Austalian Labor Party are spinning in their graves at the antics of those that have come after them.


.

An analysis of the Norway Massacre

In anyone's language, the killing of sixty nine young persons who were gunned down at a resort in Norway, now some months ago, is a tragedy of monumental proportions for which there should be no argument of the social impact that this act of slaughter guaranteed to occur, and in fact has come about, not only in Norway, but also throughout those nations who still consider themselves as part of the West.
.
Much has been written and uttered by those with some social influence from the Left who consider the Norway Massacre as having been committed by a madman, that Anders Brevik is of the 'far right' politically, and so therefore, must be considered as a 'radical far right extremist' who also happens to be insane.
.
I contest that view and make this assertion. Anders Behring Brevik is not mad nor is he a 'far right wing extremist'. And I base my assertion on the following points:
.
1. Brevik's manifesto, which was released just prior to him going on his murderous rampage, contains nothing in it that leads me to arrive at the conclusion that he is suffering some kind of mental disorder. In short, his manifesto contains nothing in it to suggest the writings or thoughts of a mad man and is to the contrary, a well planned, articulate and thorough document in its presentation.
.
2. Anyone who is familiar with the true political spectrum and not the one where all the evil deeds of the world, according to some, should be attributed to those whose polticial views are from right of center, knows only too well, that it is Anarchy that exists on the extreme far right of the political spectrum, and that Brevik, from his own words and manifesto, is no Anarchist.
.
3. The atrocity he committed was well planned and executed, which is not the modus operandi of the criminally insane who are more opportunistic when carrying out their crimes and who do not meticulously plan months ahead for their criminal act, as Brevik did.
.
4. The psychopath gains pleasure from the violence he is able to inflict on others. In comparison, and prior to carrying out his act, Brevik dosed himself up on drugs to fortify himself against what he knew he would not enjoy doing, and the heavy metal music he chose to play through his head phones had the design to limit his hearing of the screams of suffering and the sheer terror that he inflicted on his victims. Brevik knew that without the 'extras' he had no stomach to carry out what he planned, therefore, he cannot be described as a psychopath.
.
5. Nationalism straddles both sides of the political center and can be attributed to either the Left or Right of politics. Nationalism in a sense, is a concept in which individuals, groups or populations hold the nation as a rallying point to instil patriotism and a sense of sharing together the nation state. Nationalism, as was demonstrated with National Socialism can also work to alienate minority groups, such as the Jews in Nazi Germany, while fostering a superman complex within the population which can lead, and as was the case with Nazi Germany, to a sense of invincibility and a feeling of superiority over other nation states.
.
So is Brevik a Nationalist, albeit a very extreme one? A Nationalist who felt he could no longer put up with his nation being destroyed from within, by his own kind?
.
I'll leave you the reader to think about it.

The lame stream media

I have just terminated my satellite television contract and all I have now is the usual free to air TV channels on which to rely for local and international coverage of those news items which affect us all. It was becoming increasingly expensive, due to being on a fixed income, to keep shelling out the seventy odd dollars per month to watch continuous repeats of repeats, very bad movies, the odd good documentary, or a reasonable news service while prices for everything continue to rise under our current federal socialist government. In short, I could no longer afford, nor did I wish to persevere with something which if I didn't have access to, wouldn't miss!
.
So, last night, and with bated breath, I switched over to a local channel on free to air TV at 6pm to watch the news. The very first item of agenda in the hour long bulletin, which also includes weather details and sports reports was not the latest on the world being on the edge of a very high financial precipice that could drag us all into another Great Depression, nor was it the latest on the Islamist cause which is continuing unabated, and in some cases being actively assisted by the
West. There was nothing on Iran which is continuously rattling its Islamic scimitar, nor was China mentioned which is buying up Europe's debts or hundreds of other topical and important subjects that will eventually affect us all. No, the top of the hour report was of Michael Jackson's doctor being found guilty of manslaugher!!!!!!
.
The main stream media truly has lost its way!