Australia used to be a very different country to what it is now. When the author was growing up in the 1950's and 60's, Australia was until the advent of Multiculturalism and Human rights legislation, one of the most successful nations to integrate its immigrants.
Those who came here after world war two were from cultures similar to our own Judeo-Christian background that permitted easy assimilation which was also at the time government policy. Those who came here prior to the mid 1970's were generally labeled as 'New Australians' but under the United Nations false doctrine of Multiculturalism adopted in 1976, any culture was permitted to migrate here, even those cultures that were obviously the complete antithesis to our own Australian culture.
We now have around 5% of our population as Muslim and growing. There are now Islamic enclaves in our major cities and special squads of police set up to combat the crime that invariably Islam brings with it and which is statistically per head of population, out of all proportion to the rest of the population.
Never in the federated history of this nation have the scenes of outrage from young white Australians at Cronulla, a beachside suburb in Sydney, on December 11, 2005, gathered to protest over the authorities lack of intervention in the attacks against young Australian beachgoers, by Muslim Lebanese, that had become an ongoing problem up and down the east coast for some years, ever previously witnessed. The outrage was largely generated by the beating up of two lifeguards a few days earlier, but also the accumulation of years of beach harassments on young females who were given the epithet of 'Aussie sluts' by a never ending parade of male Lebanese Muslims. On Australia Day, 2009, (January 26) crowds of young white Australians, some wrapped in the National Flag and who were intent on impressing their view onto those who watched, shouted their anti-immigrant war cry in unison, 'fuck off, we're full!' as they loosely marched along the Promenade at Manly Beach. The message in the chant was very obvious to those who happened to watch that night's news.
The following Sunday's, The Sunday Telegraph, February 1, 2009, had an article by Nick Leys about TV personality, Scott Cam, who was voicing his outrage at what he described as 'young racist thugs' using the National Flag as a rallying point for their protests. What incensed Cam was his perception that the Australian Flag was being soiled by undesirable elements through acts or protests, with a racist and xenophobic undertone, which according to Cam, was demeaning our national symbol and betraying our national character. What Cam failed to realize though, was that by attacking the 'messenger' he missed what the 'messenger' was trying to tell him, and in the broader picture, the rest of the nation.
What some Australians, like Cam have failed, and to this day are still failing to comprehend, is the fact that never in Australian recorded history have large groups of young white Australians felt compelled to protest about something they perceived was happening to their nation and for which they felt absolutely powerless about. There is no precedent for what occurred at Cronulla in 2005, or up and down the east coast on Australia Day 2009, when more National Flags began to be seen than ever before, and to this day the numbers of flags continue to grow! Those who steer this nation should be asking themselves what has caused such a spike in flag waving on Australia Day and why so many young white Australians felt the need to protest the way that they did. But will the authorities ever bother with some urgently needed soul searching?
The word assimilation these days is a dirty word as far as the Multiculti- Human rights crowd is concerned, and it is now the diversity of cultures that trumps the homogenous society Australia once was. Forgotten too, is the proud record that this nation had of assimilating new migrants with a minimum of fuss, most immigrants, who having learned basic English, eventually found jobs and fended for themselves, some later becoming outstanding Australian citizens. The 'celebration' of cultures that now makes up our nation under the ludicrous notion that all cultures aspire to the same ideals is blatantly false even to a simpleton. Only Western nations have embraced this 'cultural suicide' which is not practised in any developing or third world nation. Do you believe that white Australians would be welcomed as immigrants and catered for, in countries such as Saudi Arabia, China, Indonesia, Africa etc, in ever increasing numbers while demanding special privileges as befitting Australian culture?
Is Multiculturalism really working as the collectivist SSM advertise? Or are the authorities trotting out their usual spin to try and fool the average Aussie? If Multiculturalism is indeed working, then why do we need to be constantly reminded through adverts and pamphlets? If Multiculturalism is truly working shouldn't this be plainly obvious to everyone? If Multiculturalism is working, why have there been the unprecedented protests by our young? If Multiculturalism is working why is there a need for specially introduced laws under Human Rights legislation, such as the Victorian Racial and Religious Vilification Act which is solely designed to keep any criticism at bay, of a specific culture and religion whose followers often warrant criticism? And when public interest or national security concerns matter, how do we now identify our enemies if we are not permitted to speak out about them? Where is the individual Australian's freedom of expression in this very repressive legislation?
Societies which are self critical, historically, are societies which continue to improve and survive as a culture. We are fast becoming a society that refuses to criticize. All cultures within a nation should be open to critical and honest scrutiny so as to find its place within our society, not be given a free license under Multicultural ideology to do as they please.
Those truths are self evident and are not lost on young 'thinking' Australians. No amount of selective legislation by authoritarian governments can blind them to this. They have their eyes firmly open and can see the massive con job that past and present, state and federal governments have imposed on us. It never ceases to amaze the author, that those who peddle the mantra that all cultures are equal, so we should therefore be tolerant of their views, are the first to become intolerant to their own kind by branding them as racist, bigoted or xenophobic, whenever someone raises a genuine concern about the behavior of some cultures that we are forced through the implementation of fascist laws to live with. And make no mistake, as it is the white Australian that is singled out for special attention by these people, who by issuing such degrading terms make a mockery of their own tolerance values by refusing to listen to legitimate complaints!
Is it racist to want to protect your own kind? Are Japan, China, Saudi Arabia and other Arab states racist because they refuse to allow 'others' to become citizens? Why is it only the Westerner who has this false notion that all cultures are equal, so therefore, all aspire to the same ideals? It is self evident to anyone who wishes to notice that not all cultures are equal and do not aspire to our ideals. Why are we on this path of cultural destruction through colonization by peoples from the third world? Why has immigration not become a major issue at election time, when plainly speaking, it affects all of us to some extent? Why should we be allowing more immigration to our already overcrowded cities whose infrastructures are slowly failing due to massive influxes of people? Would you as a white Australian parent, be prepared to send your child to a school that is totally ethnic in make up, including the teachers. There are now several in Sydney you may choose from!
Our youth are watching the slow destruction of our white Australian culture which is occurring before their eyes and feel emasculated about, because no one in authority will listen to their concerns. It is due to the dismissive nature of those same authorities who would rather label the patriotic messengers of those very real concerns, as 'racist', than deal with the root causes of the problems that initiated the protests in the first place, and this is due to become worse the longer it is left to fester. The white Australian is becoming a silent majority which the politicians only listen to at election time. Whenever a valid complaint concerning Islam is raised, the average white Aussie is publicly criticized and branded by those who should know better. Our young have now become subject to this anti-white mentality and are beginning to react to it. They are not blind to the political pandering to those minorities who dwell among us but refuse to assimilate.
Sources: The Sunday Telegraph, Piers Akerman, Telegraph columnist.
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Who’ll cry for South Africa?
Nelson Mandela is dead! Do we say long live the King or do we talk about the kind of man that Mandela really was?
I prefer to talk about what Mandela's legacy as president of South Africa has brought for that country because collectivist history will be much kinder to the person Mandela than I could ever be!
But first some background for my stance against a man that most of the world has been indoctrinated into believing was a 'freedom fighter'.
One of the author's last jobs as a police officer was to take the fingerprints of a middle aged white South African couple who had decided that after holidaying in Australia they would seek to become citizens. The taking of fingerprints in a small country police station that does not have the technology available to it that larger city police stations have, can be quiet a drawn out affair. So it was due to the length of time spent with the South African couple that that the author got a view of South Africa that is kept from the populace by the SSM (Soviet Style Media)
In fact, what this couple told the author has since assisted his subsequent research/investigation that has led him to a greater understanding of where we are being driven to through United Nations policies.
(A disclaimer; It is not the author's intention to present a detailed and thorough history of South Africa, only to briefly outline what the author has learned. There are many varied accounts of South African history that upon reading - the reader needs to keep in mind the many political agendas behind the writing of such history)
Briefly, this is what was learned:
South Africa was at one time almost uninhabited until White Europeans colonized that part of Africa for themselves. Those who are now known as black South Africans are the descendants of two original tribes, imported slaves or migrated into South Africa from northern African regions, to escape tribal wars, famine or other driving influences that caused mass migrations of black Africans into a then prosperous and predominately white controlled South Africa which led to the eventual outnumbering of white South Africans in their own land by ten to one.
This was a gradual process over hundreds of years.
The blacks were generally employed as low paid labor, especially in those jobs that were considered dangerous or demeaning to the white South African. During the mid 20th Century political and business pressures caused the policy of Apartheid to be officially adopted across South Africa.
Apartheid was never about practising racism, but dividing the dominant ethnic groups from each other for their mutual protection and benefit. But the word apartheid, has through distortion and political agendas, now come to mean racism to the ignorant who fail to do their own investigation into what South Africa once was and why Apartheid had to be implemented.
Today, South Africa is no longer the prosperous nation it once was under Apartheid.
Nelson Mandela was a Communist. He was also head of the MK – the terrorist wing of the ANC - and as such, signed off on many terrorist attacks that killed innocent men, women and children in its role to overthrow the South African government. He was jailed for his part in terrorist related incidents for which he has never expressed any remorse.
It doesn't matter how you dress up a rotten carcase, because its smell will eventually permeate even the densest of coverings. And so, that is enough said about Mr Mandela!
Since 1994 when Mandela became president of South Africa white farmers have once again come under attack by roaming bands of blacks who at first terrorize the family in isolated farms before attacking and killing those who resist outright and then by raping and torturing to death those who have survived the initial attack on them. To date over four thousand white farmers have met their fate through these roaming bands who are seldom apprehended by a now almost dysfunctional and corrupted South African police force.
It is now generally assumed that a form of 'white genocide' is now taking place with little interruption to its agenda from the state.
P.S.
One of the driving factors for that South African couple in deciding to leave their homeland was the racist attitudes shown toward them and which according to them, were becoming more threatening on a daily basis by black South Africans who were given an off the record wink and a nod by the state to play out their racist urges against those who were not black. But it's not only whites who are now at the receiving end of this state sanctioned racism, it is every ethnicity other than black African that has had the misfortune to be born 'South African' and who are now under the tyranny that South Africa has become and to which the SSM is now aiding and abetting in by not reporting on its slide into totalitarianism!
The architect for the demise of the Republic of South Africa is dead, but who'll cry for its descendants?
I prefer to talk about what Mandela's legacy as president of South Africa has brought for that country because collectivist history will be much kinder to the person Mandela than I could ever be!
But first some background for my stance against a man that most of the world has been indoctrinated into believing was a 'freedom fighter'.
One of the author's last jobs as a police officer was to take the fingerprints of a middle aged white South African couple who had decided that after holidaying in Australia they would seek to become citizens. The taking of fingerprints in a small country police station that does not have the technology available to it that larger city police stations have, can be quiet a drawn out affair. So it was due to the length of time spent with the South African couple that that the author got a view of South Africa that is kept from the populace by the SSM (Soviet Style Media)
In fact, what this couple told the author has since assisted his subsequent research/investigation that has led him to a greater understanding of where we are being driven to through United Nations policies.
(A disclaimer; It is not the author's intention to present a detailed and thorough history of South Africa, only to briefly outline what the author has learned. There are many varied accounts of South African history that upon reading - the reader needs to keep in mind the many political agendas behind the writing of such history)
Briefly, this is what was learned:
South Africa was at one time almost uninhabited until White Europeans colonized that part of Africa for themselves. Those who are now known as black South Africans are the descendants of two original tribes, imported slaves or migrated into South Africa from northern African regions, to escape tribal wars, famine or other driving influences that caused mass migrations of black Africans into a then prosperous and predominately white controlled South Africa which led to the eventual outnumbering of white South Africans in their own land by ten to one.
This was a gradual process over hundreds of years.
The blacks were generally employed as low paid labor, especially in those jobs that were considered dangerous or demeaning to the white South African. During the mid 20th Century political and business pressures caused the policy of Apartheid to be officially adopted across South Africa.
Apartheid was never about practising racism, but dividing the dominant ethnic groups from each other for their mutual protection and benefit. But the word apartheid, has through distortion and political agendas, now come to mean racism to the ignorant who fail to do their own investigation into what South Africa once was and why Apartheid had to be implemented.
Today, South Africa is no longer the prosperous nation it once was under Apartheid.
Nelson Mandela was a Communist. He was also head of the MK – the terrorist wing of the ANC - and as such, signed off on many terrorist attacks that killed innocent men, women and children in its role to overthrow the South African government. He was jailed for his part in terrorist related incidents for which he has never expressed any remorse.
It doesn't matter how you dress up a rotten carcase, because its smell will eventually permeate even the densest of coverings. And so, that is enough said about Mr Mandela!
Since 1994 when Mandela became president of South Africa white farmers have once again come under attack by roaming bands of blacks who at first terrorize the family in isolated farms before attacking and killing those who resist outright and then by raping and torturing to death those who have survived the initial attack on them. To date over four thousand white farmers have met their fate through these roaming bands who are seldom apprehended by a now almost dysfunctional and corrupted South African police force.
It is now generally assumed that a form of 'white genocide' is now taking place with little interruption to its agenda from the state.
P.S.
One of the driving factors for that South African couple in deciding to leave their homeland was the racist attitudes shown toward them and which according to them, were becoming more threatening on a daily basis by black South Africans who were given an off the record wink and a nod by the state to play out their racist urges against those who were not black. But it's not only whites who are now at the receiving end of this state sanctioned racism, it is every ethnicity other than black African that has had the misfortune to be born 'South African' and who are now under the tyranny that South Africa has become and to which the SSM is now aiding and abetting in by not reporting on its slide into totalitarianism!
The architect for the demise of the Republic of South Africa is dead, but who'll cry for its descendants?
Monday, November 18, 2013
The LEO and the Peace Officer
What is the difference in policing methods between a peace officer and a law enforcement officer?
Here are some examples of what it means to be a peace officer:
How many readers of this article are old enough to remember, as a kid, the cop who gave them a kick up the backside or a clip around the ears when they did something wrong?
How many can remember the instant respect that the uniform got when out in public and on the beat?
How many ex-criminals owe their 'going straight' to the fear generated of being dragged into the police station and the beating to come if they did not tell the truth or toe the line?
How many of us today can think back to the last time, if ever, they were pulled over for some traffic infringement and sternly lectured to about their stupidity rather than being handed a fine?
How many of us today can remember being out in public and in a group of noisy rowdy people who were obviously breaching the peace in the small hours of the morning and then having their heads knocked together by some cops who told them to get off the street?
How many can remember the last time the next door neighbors often and violent domestics were dealt with for good without either trouble maker being arrested on multiple occasions?
Who can remember that once upon a time one could walk into town and wander around knowing you felt safe from society's predators because there was a cop on the beat in the area somewhere?
A good peace officer was also a good cop!
Here are some examples of what a law enforcement officer (LEO) is now made to do:
First of all, today's modern university trained LEO is not permitted to do any of the above peace officer actions! The law enforcement officer would be subject to disciplinary measures, firing or even criminal charges if taking on the role of the peace officer!
The LEO is now trained to be sensitive to minority and religious expectations, to appreciate cultural diversity even if it means that common sense must be suspended so as to better appreciate that which no thinking person would accept, be psychologically aware of special mental health problems, to look for criminality in every 'job' they attend even to the extent of investigating the obvious victim, to treat illegal drug dependency as a 'social problem' and not a criminal concern, to have 'empathy' for everyone they must deal with, but above all be resistant to offered gifts from those victims of crime they have dealt with who may have thought them good at their job because the acceptance of such rewards for a job well done could lead to 'corruption!'
Why is it only the police who are attacked for being corrupt? What about the politicians and the judiciary they work for, how about their corruption which is just so obvious to many?
Some police now wear uniforms that in nearly all aspects of dress look similar in unkempt style to the very people they often arrest. So how does that earn respect?
Cops now have to stand and accept being verbally abused, threatened, intimidated and even put up with minor assault, such as being spat at. How does this inaction against those who really need to be given a hard lesson from authority earn respect?
There is no requirement for modern officers to be of a particular height or weight which has led to some very small of stature officers who are about as threatening to a big hardened criminal or a fundamentalist Muslim, as a sponge cake is to a clown.
If a couple have an argument at home or out in public, and a busybody do-gooder phones for law enforcement both couples are entered onto a police data base for 'domestic violence' argument only incident. In effect, for simply having a normal argument that may have become a little heated those involved in that 'domestic' are then registered on the police data base for future reference as persons of interest.
If one of the couple is assaulted by the other then the person who did the striking and who may happen to own firearms then becomes subject to having his/her firearms seized as a potential killer!
Don't you think it's drawing a long bow to consider an unwarranted strike in the middle of a heated argument is also a precursor for someone being capable of pre-meditated murder!
Today's law enforcement officer must also at some point in their shift do stationary or Random Breath Testing (RBT) of a mandated number of vehicle stops and alcohol testing of the vehicle drivers. It was once legal to drive with a blood alcohol concentration of .08, but this was downgraded some years ago to .05 due to the declining numbers of persons being arrested for Driving under the Influence (DUI). There is now a move within government for the dropping of a driver's alcohol concentration to zero!
No longer are police walking the beat like they once used to. CCTV dominates the public places now which is about as effective as a cardboard cut-out of a cop you may see from time to time taking up space at a Bank or Post Office. Do you the reader still feel safe today when venturing out at night into the city or large town for a bit of fun?
Highway Patrol officers now issue tickets for the most meaningless and obscure of traffic infringements instead of stern lectures or some friendly advice. Lectures, which once had a more meaningful effect on those drivers who deserve to be lectured about their stupidity, are no longer permissible. And the myriad amount of traffic laws that even a judge has to refer to the Traffic Act in Court for determinations, is impossible for the average citizen to be completely aware of while 'special advice' instead of a fine from a highway cop would go a long way in improving that drivers knowledge of traffic laws and respect toward authority!
Being fined means nothing to some people who will just continue to do what they feel like doing!
Unruly juveniles who come under police notice are now given three chances at criminal activity under various Young Offender Acts – which has variations from state to state - before being summoned to answer at Court for strike number four. Due to the limitations on Law enforcement officers to dish out 'summary justice' on the spot to an offending juvenile, there has been a marked increase of re-offending juveniles who go on to become career criminals. Where once upon a time the peace officer would effectively 'nip in the bud' most unruly juvenile's propensity for getting into trouble, the LEO is powerless and this 'powerlessness' is never more exploited than by the criminal element and the up and coming juvenile/criminal offender.
But there is no common sense applied by our lawmakers who generally have never really had anything to do with enforcing their own laws!
And as any good parent is aware of, if you do not apply some form of discipline on your children as they grow and learn, then the chances of them growing into responsible adults are to a certain extent minimized. How is it then that lawmakers, many who are responsible parents themselves, can usher in and put in place such ill thought out laws that allow our young to have three strikes at criminality before being properly dealt with?
There is more truth in the old adage about sparing the rod and spoiling the child than there is in today's airy fairy progressive (Collectivist) thinking!
What kind of police force would you the reader desire, the good cop that is also a peace officer who knows how to nip in the bud the many social problems before they get out of hand or the LEO who is trained by so called academics in a university to be sympathetic to everyone and hard on no one!
Here are some examples of what it means to be a peace officer:
How many readers of this article are old enough to remember, as a kid, the cop who gave them a kick up the backside or a clip around the ears when they did something wrong?
How many can remember the instant respect that the uniform got when out in public and on the beat?
How many ex-criminals owe their 'going straight' to the fear generated of being dragged into the police station and the beating to come if they did not tell the truth or toe the line?
How many of us today can think back to the last time, if ever, they were pulled over for some traffic infringement and sternly lectured to about their stupidity rather than being handed a fine?
How many of us today can remember being out in public and in a group of noisy rowdy people who were obviously breaching the peace in the small hours of the morning and then having their heads knocked together by some cops who told them to get off the street?
How many can remember the last time the next door neighbors often and violent domestics were dealt with for good without either trouble maker being arrested on multiple occasions?
Who can remember that once upon a time one could walk into town and wander around knowing you felt safe from society's predators because there was a cop on the beat in the area somewhere?
A good peace officer was also a good cop!
Here are some examples of what a law enforcement officer (LEO) is now made to do:
First of all, today's modern university trained LEO is not permitted to do any of the above peace officer actions! The law enforcement officer would be subject to disciplinary measures, firing or even criminal charges if taking on the role of the peace officer!
The LEO is now trained to be sensitive to minority and religious expectations, to appreciate cultural diversity even if it means that common sense must be suspended so as to better appreciate that which no thinking person would accept, be psychologically aware of special mental health problems, to look for criminality in every 'job' they attend even to the extent of investigating the obvious victim, to treat illegal drug dependency as a 'social problem' and not a criminal concern, to have 'empathy' for everyone they must deal with, but above all be resistant to offered gifts from those victims of crime they have dealt with who may have thought them good at their job because the acceptance of such rewards for a job well done could lead to 'corruption!'
Why is it only the police who are attacked for being corrupt? What about the politicians and the judiciary they work for, how about their corruption which is just so obvious to many?
Some police now wear uniforms that in nearly all aspects of dress look similar in unkempt style to the very people they often arrest. So how does that earn respect?
Cops now have to stand and accept being verbally abused, threatened, intimidated and even put up with minor assault, such as being spat at. How does this inaction against those who really need to be given a hard lesson from authority earn respect?
There is no requirement for modern officers to be of a particular height or weight which has led to some very small of stature officers who are about as threatening to a big hardened criminal or a fundamentalist Muslim, as a sponge cake is to a clown.
If a couple have an argument at home or out in public, and a busybody do-gooder phones for law enforcement both couples are entered onto a police data base for 'domestic violence' argument only incident. In effect, for simply having a normal argument that may have become a little heated those involved in that 'domestic' are then registered on the police data base for future reference as persons of interest.
If one of the couple is assaulted by the other then the person who did the striking and who may happen to own firearms then becomes subject to having his/her firearms seized as a potential killer!
Don't you think it's drawing a long bow to consider an unwarranted strike in the middle of a heated argument is also a precursor for someone being capable of pre-meditated murder!
Today's law enforcement officer must also at some point in their shift do stationary or Random Breath Testing (RBT) of a mandated number of vehicle stops and alcohol testing of the vehicle drivers. It was once legal to drive with a blood alcohol concentration of .08, but this was downgraded some years ago to .05 due to the declining numbers of persons being arrested for Driving under the Influence (DUI). There is now a move within government for the dropping of a driver's alcohol concentration to zero!
No longer are police walking the beat like they once used to. CCTV dominates the public places now which is about as effective as a cardboard cut-out of a cop you may see from time to time taking up space at a Bank or Post Office. Do you the reader still feel safe today when venturing out at night into the city or large town for a bit of fun?
Highway Patrol officers now issue tickets for the most meaningless and obscure of traffic infringements instead of stern lectures or some friendly advice. Lectures, which once had a more meaningful effect on those drivers who deserve to be lectured about their stupidity, are no longer permissible. And the myriad amount of traffic laws that even a judge has to refer to the Traffic Act in Court for determinations, is impossible for the average citizen to be completely aware of while 'special advice' instead of a fine from a highway cop would go a long way in improving that drivers knowledge of traffic laws and respect toward authority!
Being fined means nothing to some people who will just continue to do what they feel like doing!
Unruly juveniles who come under police notice are now given three chances at criminal activity under various Young Offender Acts – which has variations from state to state - before being summoned to answer at Court for strike number four. Due to the limitations on Law enforcement officers to dish out 'summary justice' on the spot to an offending juvenile, there has been a marked increase of re-offending juveniles who go on to become career criminals. Where once upon a time the peace officer would effectively 'nip in the bud' most unruly juvenile's propensity for getting into trouble, the LEO is powerless and this 'powerlessness' is never more exploited than by the criminal element and the up and coming juvenile/criminal offender.
But there is no common sense applied by our lawmakers who generally have never really had anything to do with enforcing their own laws!
And as any good parent is aware of, if you do not apply some form of discipline on your children as they grow and learn, then the chances of them growing into responsible adults are to a certain extent minimized. How is it then that lawmakers, many who are responsible parents themselves, can usher in and put in place such ill thought out laws that allow our young to have three strikes at criminality before being properly dealt with?
There is more truth in the old adage about sparing the rod and spoiling the child than there is in today's airy fairy progressive (Collectivist) thinking!
What kind of police force would you the reader desire, the good cop that is also a peace officer who knows how to nip in the bud the many social problems before they get out of hand or the LEO who is trained by so called academics in a university to be sympathetic to everyone and hard on no one!
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
The Day America Died
On November 22 this year, 2013, it will be 50 years since the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. This author was twelve years old when this tragic event occurred and can remember exactly where he was and what he was doing at the time. The author can also recall the stunned faces of strangers as the news became common knowledge and the reaction of his parents which was one of dismay, when he returned home on that day now so long ago.
After half a century later and after theory upon theory for why Kennedy was killed and by whom, the question still remains officially unanswered to this day.
Some historical background:
On January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower gave his now famous farewell speech in which he implored future leaders to address the growth of the military industrial complex which if left unchecked would undermine the very system that allowed it to operate.
On April 27, 1961, President Kennedy presented a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association that has also become famous for his remarks about secret societies and the ramifications for free and open societies, that if they wish to remain free and open, will necessarily need to limit their government's secrecy.
Also in that speech was his imploring to those newspaper owners to self-censor those news stories that might give their undeclared enemy, the Soviets, any information that could be regarded as having a national security concern. Kennedy was not about to give more authority to the alphabet soup spying agencies which he believed would eventually be used to undermine the very fabric of American society.
But was he right in this assessment?
Also in that speech given on April 27, 1961, was a reference to the undeclared war by an undeclared enemy that used infiltration rather than invasion to gain its ground against the United States. This author believes that if anyone has any doubt at all as to what Kennedy was referring to, all they need do is to cast their eyes at what the United States has now become. It is obvious to this author at least that what Kennedy and Eisenhower warned about has been rather successful in its mission!
We may never know what transpired between President Eisenhower and President- elect, Kennedy when meeting at the White House, but when one looks at the contents of both speeches given by such outstanding and astute leaders within months of each other, one is struck by the urgency of the situation that appears to have been known to both men.
There is now a book on the market going by the title, American Betrayal, by Diana West, who is copping an awful lot of flak from those who choose to guard against what has gone down in America over the past 70 years. The thesis of Ms West's book crosses paths with those two speeches given in 1961 for which this author believes, President Kennedy was assassinated. That act of treachery by an alphabet soup spy agency seeking further controls over the government and the citizenry, also guaranteed the outcome, that America would no longer be the open and free society it once was!
After half a century later and after theory upon theory for why Kennedy was killed and by whom, the question still remains officially unanswered to this day.
Some historical background:
On January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower gave his now famous farewell speech in which he implored future leaders to address the growth of the military industrial complex which if left unchecked would undermine the very system that allowed it to operate.
On April 27, 1961, President Kennedy presented a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association that has also become famous for his remarks about secret societies and the ramifications for free and open societies, that if they wish to remain free and open, will necessarily need to limit their government's secrecy.
Also in that speech was his imploring to those newspaper owners to self-censor those news stories that might give their undeclared enemy, the Soviets, any information that could be regarded as having a national security concern. Kennedy was not about to give more authority to the alphabet soup spying agencies which he believed would eventually be used to undermine the very fabric of American society.
But was he right in this assessment?
Also in that speech given on April 27, 1961, was a reference to the undeclared war by an undeclared enemy that used infiltration rather than invasion to gain its ground against the United States. This author believes that if anyone has any doubt at all as to what Kennedy was referring to, all they need do is to cast their eyes at what the United States has now become. It is obvious to this author at least that what Kennedy and Eisenhower warned about has been rather successful in its mission!
We may never know what transpired between President Eisenhower and President- elect, Kennedy when meeting at the White House, but when one looks at the contents of both speeches given by such outstanding and astute leaders within months of each other, one is struck by the urgency of the situation that appears to have been known to both men.
There is now a book on the market going by the title, American Betrayal, by Diana West, who is copping an awful lot of flak from those who choose to guard against what has gone down in America over the past 70 years. The thesis of Ms West's book crosses paths with those two speeches given in 1961 for which this author believes, President Kennedy was assassinated. That act of treachery by an alphabet soup spy agency seeking further controls over the government and the citizenry, also guaranteed the outcome, that America would no longer be the open and free society it once was!
Saturday, November 2, 2013
THE AGENDA
What better way for the controlling Elite to have the eyes of the populace that they wish to control through the gradual implementation of their Agenda averted from their tyrannical plan than to introduce Islam –'The Religion of Peace' – into our midst?
Could you the reader think of a more distracting influence for the populace?
Do you the reader also believe that is just pure coincidence that every Western and Westernized nation is now importing Islam, which is the complete antithesis to every value still currently held by those nations that still believe they have a future?
Ask yourself why it is that only the West has sacrificed its wealth through destroying its own manufacturing base to the point that the West is now reliant on those nations that now sell to us what we once made ourselves and that we obediently take in the world's flotsam and jetsam as directed by the United Nations. Only in the West can an outsider become one of its citizens on face value, even though most of those foreigners have no inclination, in fact are encouraged not to, participate in that nation's culture or accept its values.
Do you also honestly believe that it is for the benefit of those nations to be beholden to the United Nations for their political, environmental and social directions?
Do you believe that the United Nations, an unelected and now bloated World bureaucracy reliant on the 'donations' that every nation now latched onto its rotting carcase is directed to give, should be dictating to us what policies we need to be adopting?
This has not occurred without some kind of planning for it to come about. Please do not delude yourself that it is just some kind of coincidence that the West is now on its suicidal path. A retiring British Foreign Secretary once stated words to the effect of: 'No political course comes about by accident'. The name of the person who uttered those words eludes this author, but they were uttered, and it would seem, in a moment of rare honesty.
Can you now see some kind of agenda here in all this, whereby the slow dismantling of the West through immigration, loss of manufacturing and being forced to adopt UN policies via the intimidation of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to withhold borrowing capacity to governments that refuse to adopt such policies? If you find this reasoning a little hard to swallow then ask yourself why there is such a thing as the United Nations, a World Bank and International Monetary Fund, and what is it exactly that they are in place to achieve?
Do you think they are benevolent or malevolent?
You may also find this interesting: The only nations that are now awake to what the West is doing to itself are those the West once labelled as being behind the Iron Curtain. The West's old enemies, Russia and China and their vassal states, know full well the fate that the West will share in at some point in the future. Vladimir Putin has even given a speech warning his people about the folly of the West and the suicide path it is on! The Chinese and Russians are now shoring up their own currency with similar thinking nations knowing the American Dollar cannot maintain its current world currency status.
They know the American Dollar is about to collapse and what that will entail, do you?
Could you the reader think of a more distracting influence for the populace?
Do you the reader also believe that is just pure coincidence that every Western and Westernized nation is now importing Islam, which is the complete antithesis to every value still currently held by those nations that still believe they have a future?
Ask yourself why it is that only the West has sacrificed its wealth through destroying its own manufacturing base to the point that the West is now reliant on those nations that now sell to us what we once made ourselves and that we obediently take in the world's flotsam and jetsam as directed by the United Nations. Only in the West can an outsider become one of its citizens on face value, even though most of those foreigners have no inclination, in fact are encouraged not to, participate in that nation's culture or accept its values.
Do you also honestly believe that it is for the benefit of those nations to be beholden to the United Nations for their political, environmental and social directions?
Do you believe that the United Nations, an unelected and now bloated World bureaucracy reliant on the 'donations' that every nation now latched onto its rotting carcase is directed to give, should be dictating to us what policies we need to be adopting?
This has not occurred without some kind of planning for it to come about. Please do not delude yourself that it is just some kind of coincidence that the West is now on its suicidal path. A retiring British Foreign Secretary once stated words to the effect of: 'No political course comes about by accident'. The name of the person who uttered those words eludes this author, but they were uttered, and it would seem, in a moment of rare honesty.
Can you now see some kind of agenda here in all this, whereby the slow dismantling of the West through immigration, loss of manufacturing and being forced to adopt UN policies via the intimidation of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to withhold borrowing capacity to governments that refuse to adopt such policies? If you find this reasoning a little hard to swallow then ask yourself why there is such a thing as the United Nations, a World Bank and International Monetary Fund, and what is it exactly that they are in place to achieve?
Do you think they are benevolent or malevolent?
You may also find this interesting: The only nations that are now awake to what the West is doing to itself are those the West once labelled as being behind the Iron Curtain. The West's old enemies, Russia and China and their vassal states, know full well the fate that the West will share in at some point in the future. Vladimir Putin has even given a speech warning his people about the folly of the West and the suicide path it is on! The Chinese and Russians are now shoring up their own currency with similar thinking nations knowing the American Dollar cannot maintain its current world currency status.
They know the American Dollar is about to collapse and what that will entail, do you?
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Propaganda, Conspiracy Theory or Truth?
Most people go about their daily lives based on a predictable course, a kind of certainty through life of what it is that they will do and what they will be expected to do, either as employees, leading hands, managers or bosses. Some of those as just described will also have goals to strive for in life that keeps them as employees, leading hands, managers or bosses, while many in the majority are quite content to have no goals in life at all, and apart from sating their immediate hunger and thirst while being entertained by a never ending array of media and sports distractions have no long term plans for their own wellbeing, and are happy to let others guide their daily lives and futures, so long as their immediate personal needs are not interfered with.
It has been estimated that at any time in a nation's history the majority of the population, and this has been estimated to be up to 80%, will in all probability care little for what their elected representatives may get up to while in office.
It has also been estimated that of the remaining 20% of the nation's population, 10% will aspire to hold power over the remaining 90% through greed and political means, while the remaining 10% will be aware of those to whom wealth, power and eventual control are eagerly desired, and what the eventual misuse of such a combination will bring about when left in the hands of an immoral few, and will as a duty of concern, spend a great deal of their time trying to warn the other 80%!
Ever wonder why ALL Western governments are into gun control, restricting property rights through Sustainable Development (Agenda 21) taxing the air that we breathe (Global Warming) Sustainable Energy programs (Kyoto Protocol) flooding our nations with the third world (Multiculturalism) while telling us daily that it is good for us when even a simpleton would beg to differ?
How much trust do you place in your politicians?
Once upon a time, and a long time ago every citizen of a Western nation could rely on the media at the time to provide them with factual up to date News and general information that was broadcast with the public's welfare and interest in mind. Today that is no longer the case, and the decline in sales for some of the print media along with viewers and listeners of free to air TV and Radio stations, to use as an example – which the author believes is due to the blatant dishonesty now practised - the reasons for which should be so obvious to the well informed. Many in the majority population of Western nations are now realizing that what is generally termed the MSM or as this author now terms it, the SSM, (Soviet Style Media) have become propaganda arms for those who wish to control their access to real information. The elitists, who are gradually exerting their agenda onto us through the restriction of personal property rights and liberties are really Globalists with a desire for control over the entire planet as the main game.
Ever wonder why the SSM call illegal immigrants or aliens, 'asylum seekers' 'boat people' or 'undocumented workers', or why Islamic terrorists are referred to as 'militants' 'freedom fighters' or even, 'rebels'? When was the last time you heard the perpetrator of a crime mentioned by race if it was an actual black on white crime? But most important of all to our own wellbeing and survival – when was the last time you heard someone from the SSM give you an update of the number of Islamic terrorist attacks from around the world?
The internet is proving to be a thorn in the side of those who have been steadily whittling away our personal freedoms and is a system of communication that has given us almost instantaneous correspondence to all points of the Globe, a limited amount of freedom in which to express opinions and to provide evidentiary facts, so long as the internet provider is not also on board with the Globalists and their agenda!
Ever wonder why the NSA has been spying on its own citizens and those of other nations? Did you stop to consider why the former NSA employee Snowden, decided to become a whistle blower?
The United Nations was set up in 1947 largely due to the failure of the League of Nations, or so we are told! Ever since that time the United Nations has become an over bloated bureaucracy filled with the usual failed politicians and totalitarian thinkers. ALL of the policies mentioned, and some that have not been mentioned in this article, have originated from within the United Nations. The UN policies now adopted by ALL Western nations have been introduced without consent from the people who elected those who did the signing. United Nations policies now trump each individual nation's Bill of Rights, Constitution or whatever Bill represents each nation's laws which are constantly being usurped by governments without any input from individual citizens these laws now affect and in future, will limit the individual rights that most of us still have.
And it is only Western nations that have adopted all the UN policies! But where is all this heading?
One world government, or a New Global Order, has been mentioned many, many times though the years and over the airwaves and in the print media. Do you the reader believe that to be propaganda, a conspiracy theory or the truth?
It has been estimated that at any time in a nation's history the majority of the population, and this has been estimated to be up to 80%, will in all probability care little for what their elected representatives may get up to while in office.
It has also been estimated that of the remaining 20% of the nation's population, 10% will aspire to hold power over the remaining 90% through greed and political means, while the remaining 10% will be aware of those to whom wealth, power and eventual control are eagerly desired, and what the eventual misuse of such a combination will bring about when left in the hands of an immoral few, and will as a duty of concern, spend a great deal of their time trying to warn the other 80%!
Ever wonder why ALL Western governments are into gun control, restricting property rights through Sustainable Development (Agenda 21) taxing the air that we breathe (Global Warming) Sustainable Energy programs (Kyoto Protocol) flooding our nations with the third world (Multiculturalism) while telling us daily that it is good for us when even a simpleton would beg to differ?
How much trust do you place in your politicians?
Once upon a time, and a long time ago every citizen of a Western nation could rely on the media at the time to provide them with factual up to date News and general information that was broadcast with the public's welfare and interest in mind. Today that is no longer the case, and the decline in sales for some of the print media along with viewers and listeners of free to air TV and Radio stations, to use as an example – which the author believes is due to the blatant dishonesty now practised - the reasons for which should be so obvious to the well informed. Many in the majority population of Western nations are now realizing that what is generally termed the MSM or as this author now terms it, the SSM, (Soviet Style Media) have become propaganda arms for those who wish to control their access to real information. The elitists, who are gradually exerting their agenda onto us through the restriction of personal property rights and liberties are really Globalists with a desire for control over the entire planet as the main game.
Ever wonder why the SSM call illegal immigrants or aliens, 'asylum seekers' 'boat people' or 'undocumented workers', or why Islamic terrorists are referred to as 'militants' 'freedom fighters' or even, 'rebels'? When was the last time you heard the perpetrator of a crime mentioned by race if it was an actual black on white crime? But most important of all to our own wellbeing and survival – when was the last time you heard someone from the SSM give you an update of the number of Islamic terrorist attacks from around the world?
The internet is proving to be a thorn in the side of those who have been steadily whittling away our personal freedoms and is a system of communication that has given us almost instantaneous correspondence to all points of the Globe, a limited amount of freedom in which to express opinions and to provide evidentiary facts, so long as the internet provider is not also on board with the Globalists and their agenda!
Ever wonder why the NSA has been spying on its own citizens and those of other nations? Did you stop to consider why the former NSA employee Snowden, decided to become a whistle blower?
The United Nations was set up in 1947 largely due to the failure of the League of Nations, or so we are told! Ever since that time the United Nations has become an over bloated bureaucracy filled with the usual failed politicians and totalitarian thinkers. ALL of the policies mentioned, and some that have not been mentioned in this article, have originated from within the United Nations. The UN policies now adopted by ALL Western nations have been introduced without consent from the people who elected those who did the signing. United Nations policies now trump each individual nation's Bill of Rights, Constitution or whatever Bill represents each nation's laws which are constantly being usurped by governments without any input from individual citizens these laws now affect and in future, will limit the individual rights that most of us still have.
And it is only Western nations that have adopted all the UN policies! But where is all this heading?
One world government, or a New Global Order, has been mentioned many, many times though the years and over the airwaves and in the print media. Do you the reader believe that to be propaganda, a conspiracy theory or the truth?
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Humility Trumps Evil!
Our Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, whose party the Liberals –-described as conservative, was elected in a landslide by the people on September 7, 2013, after suffering through six years of a Federal Labor government – described as socialist, is one politician who is prepared to walk the walk while other politicians, more particularly the Socialists, just talk the talk.
While the authors home state of New South Wales, more particularly the Blue Mountains due west of Sydney, has been witnessing the devastating bush fires which have destroyed more than 200 homes as of last count, the PM has assisted the NSW Rural Fire Service by signing on for a 12 hour night shift last weekend and taking part in fighting the fires that are still threatening the residential areas around the state's capital city.
You see, apart from being the PM, Tony Abbott is also a volunteer fire fighter for the NSW Rural Fire Service and a part time Lifeguard on Sydney's Northern Beaches. And as if this was not enough for him and his personal input into the Australian community, he also devotes two weeks of his annual leave to personally assist Aboriginal communities. Next year he is also planning 'Pollie Ride' which will take him over a pre-planned route on a bicycle, and over a number of days, to raise money for one of the many charities he also devotes his time to.
But you won't read or hear about this from the SSM (Soviet Style Media) who avoid any mention of his selflessness, his humility in his service to others and his courage when fighting fires or saving lives at the beach.
Instead, Tony Abbott has been relentlessly pursued by the SSM, the 'intelligentsia' and freelance Left wing writers, not because he has done anything wrong, but because of his piety which the Left simply cannot allow to gain a foothold in the public's imagination.
Tony Abbott is a Catholic who places a lot of faith in his religion and who once studied to be a Priest which has given the Left much ammunition in trying to publicly discredit him. He used to be called the 'Mad Monk' was considered to be 'unelectable' and a millstone around the collective necks of the Liberal Party, but he has confounded all his detractors and critics by becoming the Prime Minister of Australia!
And the Left just hate him while hurling at him all their absurd vitriol and vituperation that those who know what they do is wrong and who fear being exposed for what they do are capable of. The humble actions of a God fearing man causes them to utter even more absurd and inane comments when they realize they are losing the Australian public at large who are switching off to their childish tantrums. Tony Abbott will eventually cause the Left to finally expose itself for what it is and who inhabits it – a bunch of self-serving hypocrites who have absolutely no room in their lives for God or any empathy whatsoever for their fellow human beings. The Left's lust for personal pleasure and their greed for power and wealth have no limitations and because there are no limitations on what the Left will always degenerate to, they will drag us all down with them if we do not start pushing back!
Well done Tony Abbott, a humble man and Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia.
While the authors home state of New South Wales, more particularly the Blue Mountains due west of Sydney, has been witnessing the devastating bush fires which have destroyed more than 200 homes as of last count, the PM has assisted the NSW Rural Fire Service by signing on for a 12 hour night shift last weekend and taking part in fighting the fires that are still threatening the residential areas around the state's capital city.
You see, apart from being the PM, Tony Abbott is also a volunteer fire fighter for the NSW Rural Fire Service and a part time Lifeguard on Sydney's Northern Beaches. And as if this was not enough for him and his personal input into the Australian community, he also devotes two weeks of his annual leave to personally assist Aboriginal communities. Next year he is also planning 'Pollie Ride' which will take him over a pre-planned route on a bicycle, and over a number of days, to raise money for one of the many charities he also devotes his time to.
But you won't read or hear about this from the SSM (Soviet Style Media) who avoid any mention of his selflessness, his humility in his service to others and his courage when fighting fires or saving lives at the beach.
Instead, Tony Abbott has been relentlessly pursued by the SSM, the 'intelligentsia' and freelance Left wing writers, not because he has done anything wrong, but because of his piety which the Left simply cannot allow to gain a foothold in the public's imagination.
Tony Abbott is a Catholic who places a lot of faith in his religion and who once studied to be a Priest which has given the Left much ammunition in trying to publicly discredit him. He used to be called the 'Mad Monk' was considered to be 'unelectable' and a millstone around the collective necks of the Liberal Party, but he has confounded all his detractors and critics by becoming the Prime Minister of Australia!
And the Left just hate him while hurling at him all their absurd vitriol and vituperation that those who know what they do is wrong and who fear being exposed for what they do are capable of. The humble actions of a God fearing man causes them to utter even more absurd and inane comments when they realize they are losing the Australian public at large who are switching off to their childish tantrums. Tony Abbott will eventually cause the Left to finally expose itself for what it is and who inhabits it – a bunch of self-serving hypocrites who have absolutely no room in their lives for God or any empathy whatsoever for their fellow human beings. The Left's lust for personal pleasure and their greed for power and wealth have no limitations and because there are no limitations on what the Left will always degenerate to, they will drag us all down with them if we do not start pushing back!
Well done Tony Abbott, a humble man and Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia.
Monday, October 21, 2013
The Criminal and the Politician
On October 9, 2013, Mark Brandon Reid died from liver cancer. Reid, whose alias Chopper, was a notorious criminal who made a kind of living - that is until he decided to have his criminality put into print form in a number of paperbacks which gave him a not too modest, but honest income, after he declared his 'retirement' from being a career criminal – from preying on other criminals.
Reid's 'death bed confession' also cleared up four murders from the cold case files of Victoria Police that had been on the books for decades. All four persons named by Reid as having been murdered by him were well known criminals in their own right. Reid had even been tried for one of the killings for which he was found not guilty in a court of law.
That really doesn't instil a lot of faith in our justice system does it!
Reid knew how to 'milk' his notoriety for all it was worth through several interviews on TV and other media after his 'retirement'. Even a movie has been made about his 'adventures'. One could say that his infamy gained him much celebrity, particularly among the Soviet Style Media (SSM) – it should now be obvious to anyone who has studied up on their history that the current style of what is generally and loosely termed, Main Stream Media (MSM) is highly inaccurate, as the MSM now operates along the old Soviet lines of Pravda and Izvestia, and so this author will now use the term SSM to describe today's media which self-censors and sanitizes that which is thought to be politically incorrect or goes against the yearned for socialist establishment it supports – that went out of its way at times to laud Reid's criminal exploits. In their eyes, he was working against the capitalist system, wasn't he?
Reid has now become a kind of folk hero to some, especially to the non-thinkers of the world who believe they are victims of the society they share with the rest of us. Like Ned Kelly, Reid will now go into the annals of Australian folklore where his exploits will be debated forever more.
But there were two aspects to Chopper Reid that this author noted for which this author, and grudgingly, has some respect for. One, it was his modus operandi to only pick on the criminal elements of society. He did not prey on innocent members of the society he lived in. And two, in his last days on this Earth Reid was questioned by the SSM why he was not on the donor register to receive a liver transplant, his answer being; "Why should I, a 58 year old, take the place of some ten year old kid".
Reid was also a man of his word. If he told you he was going to do something, no matter how outrageous or criminal, you could take his word to the Bank!
But what has the heading of this short article got to do with politicians?
Then ask yourself this question; what is the difference between Chopper Reid and a politician, and who would you trust?
Reid's 'death bed confession' also cleared up four murders from the cold case files of Victoria Police that had been on the books for decades. All four persons named by Reid as having been murdered by him were well known criminals in their own right. Reid had even been tried for one of the killings for which he was found not guilty in a court of law.
That really doesn't instil a lot of faith in our justice system does it!
Reid knew how to 'milk' his notoriety for all it was worth through several interviews on TV and other media after his 'retirement'. Even a movie has been made about his 'adventures'. One could say that his infamy gained him much celebrity, particularly among the Soviet Style Media (SSM) – it should now be obvious to anyone who has studied up on their history that the current style of what is generally and loosely termed, Main Stream Media (MSM) is highly inaccurate, as the MSM now operates along the old Soviet lines of Pravda and Izvestia, and so this author will now use the term SSM to describe today's media which self-censors and sanitizes that which is thought to be politically incorrect or goes against the yearned for socialist establishment it supports – that went out of its way at times to laud Reid's criminal exploits. In their eyes, he was working against the capitalist system, wasn't he?
Reid has now become a kind of folk hero to some, especially to the non-thinkers of the world who believe they are victims of the society they share with the rest of us. Like Ned Kelly, Reid will now go into the annals of Australian folklore where his exploits will be debated forever more.
But there were two aspects to Chopper Reid that this author noted for which this author, and grudgingly, has some respect for. One, it was his modus operandi to only pick on the criminal elements of society. He did not prey on innocent members of the society he lived in. And two, in his last days on this Earth Reid was questioned by the SSM why he was not on the donor register to receive a liver transplant, his answer being; "Why should I, a 58 year old, take the place of some ten year old kid".
Reid was also a man of his word. If he told you he was going to do something, no matter how outrageous or criminal, you could take his word to the Bank!
But what has the heading of this short article got to do with politicians?
Then ask yourself this question; what is the difference between Chopper Reid and a politician, and who would you trust?
Saturday, October 19, 2013
The Faulty Science of Theories
It has recently been widely reported that a number of ancient hominid skulls have been unearthed at a place called Dmansi in Georgia – the Georgia that is located on the Russian border - that are reputed to be 1.8 million years old? What has given these skulls relevance is that simple stone tools have also been found in the immediate precinct of the location which strongly suggests the tools were used at some time in the distant past by the owners of those skulls. This find is then given as further evidence for the evolution of Man and for which this find may well re-write the history books on what has so far been given out as factual evidence for the common link between Man and Monkey. But first; how anything can be reported as being so precisely aged as those skulls have been, is beyond this writer, as carbon dating has been proven to be less than accurate when determining precise ages due to the many variables such as;
1. Variations in the difference of the carbon footprint between the atmospheric and the geographically located over time.
2. Isotopic Fractionation.
3. Variations in the carbon footprint ratio in different parts of the location.
4. Contamination.
Even the scientists examining the Shroud of Turin cannot agree for a precise date which is measured in hundreds of years and not hundreds of thousands of years for those skulls, so how can anyone be so precise with their examination to report a finding of 1.8 million years?
And if there is a common link, often referred to as the 'missing link' between Man and Monkey, then where is it and why haven't we found it yet?
Too, the reporting of the evolution of man by the MSM, as if it is a factual event rather than what The Evolution of the species still is, a theory, is disingenuous at best and being deceptive at worst. Like all theories, such as Global Warming, no credibility should be given them until the two theories are proven!
If evolution has been the driver of our current species of Homo Sapien Sapien, a species that seems to have burst onto the planet tens of thousands of years ago without any found direct linkage to those known hominids that preceded us, why has our species not evolved further? If evolution really occurs as most Athiests agree it does, then why aren't we witnessing any examples of the evolutionary process that could prove the theory today?
1. Variations in the difference of the carbon footprint between the atmospheric and the geographically located over time.
2. Isotopic Fractionation.
3. Variations in the carbon footprint ratio in different parts of the location.
4. Contamination.
Even the scientists examining the Shroud of Turin cannot agree for a precise date which is measured in hundreds of years and not hundreds of thousands of years for those skulls, so how can anyone be so precise with their examination to report a finding of 1.8 million years?
And if there is a common link, often referred to as the 'missing link' between Man and Monkey, then where is it and why haven't we found it yet?
Too, the reporting of the evolution of man by the MSM, as if it is a factual event rather than what The Evolution of the species still is, a theory, is disingenuous at best and being deceptive at worst. Like all theories, such as Global Warming, no credibility should be given them until the two theories are proven!
If evolution has been the driver of our current species of Homo Sapien Sapien, a species that seems to have burst onto the planet tens of thousands of years ago without any found direct linkage to those known hominids that preceded us, why has our species not evolved further? If evolution really occurs as most Athiests agree it does, then why aren't we witnessing any examples of the evolutionary process that could prove the theory today?
Saturday, October 12, 2013
An English Act of Defiance
The English Defence League (EDL) was formed by a few like - minded English people who having witnessed the march through Luton by a contingent of returning British soldiers some years ago became concerned when the soldiers came under and subject to verbal abuse, had several items of rubbish thrown at them and a very public display of spitting at their feet by a large number of Muslim residents. What really incensed the English observers though was the cowardly and acquiescent behaviour of the attending police who chose to do nothing.
Those observant Englishmen then realized that any nation that allowed its own returning soldiers to be publicly abused and humiliated and chose to do nothing about it would also allow their own citizenry to be subject to such behaviour. Their England was a country in trouble.
The EDL gradually made a name for itself by holding public demonstrations by peacefully marching through several towns and cities across Britain that had become 'Islamized' to draw public attention to the slow 'colonization' and plight of their nation falling into Islamic fundamentalism. What started out with a few score members soon grew into thousands across the British Isles. The rapid rise of the EDL alerted the British establishment – and one may include most of the media, especially the BBC - who have been unitedly and methodically undermining the future of the Briton and his survival. Ever since the mid-1960's and via the importation of non-Britons, massive social upheaval has occurred which is yet to be fully determined, and then appreciated, across Britain as a whole.
At least most of those who arrived during the latter part of the 20th Century shared in British ideals, and to some extent, have assimilated into larger British society, but not so with the influx of large numbers of Muslims from India and Pakistan and recently from middle eastern countries, who have all formed into 'ghettoes' or the Islamic Ummah in towns and cities throughout Britain. There are now 'no go areas' for the Briton in most large cities and towns who realize that they are not welcome in those areas in their own land where the Islamic presence has turned what once resembled and was recognized as Britishness into something resembling, and has more in common with, Pakistan and India.
But it is not just the alert Briton who has now been made to feel a stranger in his own land, his children are now being raped by Muslim gangs who specialize in 'grooming' young British females, some as young as ten, by plying them with drugs and alcohol and then pass them around from house to house and even from town to town. The British National Party alerted the Establishment to this degradation of young white females in 2002, but was soon hounded into silence by a willing media who plays the Establishment's tune and it wasn't until the EDL began to expose the sordid Muslim gangs and their grooming methods to a wider public audience, that the Establishment were forced to act against this cultural jihad being waged on their own people by an imported people who practice an ideology called Islam, an ideology that is the complete antithesis to the values of a Western nation!
A greater act of treachery by the British Establishment there has never been!
Many Western writers since the advent of 9/11 have now exposed the criminality of the imported Muslim who is over represented in all jails in all Western lands. The collective criminality of Muslims should have been the death knell for the nation destroying policy of multiculturalism and its fascist enforcer, political correctness, which were both dreamed up in that denizen of moral decay, the United Nations.
Yet it is still being embraced by all Western nations!
Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll were co-founders of the EDL and had until October, 2013, led the EDL through many towns and cities, always with police approval and always peacefully. That of course has not stopped the Muslims and their co-conspirators, Unite Against Fascism (UAF) the Socialist Alliance and other Left Wing socialist groups from trying to disrupt the EDL marches through intimidation tactics or outright assault against the members by hurling any handy missiles, such as bricks and bottles onto the marchers, or infiltrating the EDL and attacking police during the marches.
Who pays these mobs to practice their violence?
The media have always taken the side of UAF and their allies, even though there is ample evidence that places any trouble caused at those marches squarely with the Socialists and Fascists (UAF) – and the UAF is a fascist organization which is so very obvious to anyone who knows their history and how the fascists and Nazis used/use violent methods to get their way.
So the cards are well and truly stacked against the EDL especially with the recent controversial resignations of Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon) and Kevin Carroll to which the Establishment had hoped the EDL now lacking popular leaders would disintegrate, but which does not appear to be the case at this time of writing. However, that could change after the weekend (October 12) march in Bradford and the handling of the EDL by local police who receive their orders indirectly from the Establishment.
While the EDL have surprised the British Establishment with how quickly the movement spread and how effective it is still in polarizing public opinion in its favor, the EDL, to this author's thinking at least, have been letting those down who know what it is they are up against when taking on the 'colonization' of their own land, and the Establishment, the media and police who are openly protecting those whose job it is to 'colonize'.
The author wishes to point out and criticize five policies the EDL has as its mission statement, and they are;
1. Human Rights - Well doesn't the Magna Carta, and the English Bill of Rights along with the law of the land - common law, guarantee everyone's rights who is a British citizen? Why take a UN inspired policy which was never meant for highly evolved Western nations and run with it when Britain is one of those nations in which basic equality under the law was first enacted? Was this included just to appease the EDL members, or the Establishments sensibility?
2. Democracy, rule of law and oppose Sharia? Wouldn't oppose fundamentalist Islam make more sense? How will the EDL uphold democracy and the rule of law when those opposed to them are not playing by the same rules?
3. Public Education to give a more balanced picture of Islam? The only picture of Islam that the public should see is the REAL Islam which is the complete antithesis to that which the EDL are supposed to uphold. The REAL Islam is on display around the world and in individual nations that have accepted large numbers of Muslims as immigrants 24/7 to those who are willing to see and accept it. The EDL is fighting Islam and that means through necessity, that NO Muslims should be members.
4. Respecting tradition, but openly embracing the best that other cultures can offer? Who gets to consider what is the best from any culture? What part of Islam would be worth accepting as the best? What part of Indian/Pakistani culture would be considered the best? Why is this crap about respecting tradition being put forward when the only culture that Islam respects is Islamic and the only tradition that should be respected is the British tradition?
5. International outlook – working with other nations? How is that achieved when some of those nations have banned the EDL from marching in them?
The author believes the above 'mission statement' is naïve at best and just plain cloud cuckoo land stuff at worst because it is not Islamic extremism that the EDL are marching against, it is Islamic Fundamentalism they are fighting which needs to be recognized. When one is taking the fight up to those who are trying to destroy the place in which you were born and raised and have grown to love, then airy fairy crap like that 'mission statement' is completely out of place and unworkable until the country you are fighting to preserve has been restored to what it once was.
The EDL hierarchy need to drastically re-think their mission statement if they are to survive and they need to discard the multiculti crap that has pervaded and distorted their thinking. They are English first and foremost and England is the land they are fighting to protect. Everything else, including those who wish to join in, come second place to what must be done to reclaim Britain from those who are slowly destroying it. The EDL must also become political, they must register their movement as a political party which the Establishment will then find very difficult to undermine and intimidate individual members as they have done with Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll.
Those observant Englishmen then realized that any nation that allowed its own returning soldiers to be publicly abused and humiliated and chose to do nothing about it would also allow their own citizenry to be subject to such behaviour. Their England was a country in trouble.
The EDL gradually made a name for itself by holding public demonstrations by peacefully marching through several towns and cities across Britain that had become 'Islamized' to draw public attention to the slow 'colonization' and plight of their nation falling into Islamic fundamentalism. What started out with a few score members soon grew into thousands across the British Isles. The rapid rise of the EDL alerted the British establishment – and one may include most of the media, especially the BBC - who have been unitedly and methodically undermining the future of the Briton and his survival. Ever since the mid-1960's and via the importation of non-Britons, massive social upheaval has occurred which is yet to be fully determined, and then appreciated, across Britain as a whole.
At least most of those who arrived during the latter part of the 20th Century shared in British ideals, and to some extent, have assimilated into larger British society, but not so with the influx of large numbers of Muslims from India and Pakistan and recently from middle eastern countries, who have all formed into 'ghettoes' or the Islamic Ummah in towns and cities throughout Britain. There are now 'no go areas' for the Briton in most large cities and towns who realize that they are not welcome in those areas in their own land where the Islamic presence has turned what once resembled and was recognized as Britishness into something resembling, and has more in common with, Pakistan and India.
But it is not just the alert Briton who has now been made to feel a stranger in his own land, his children are now being raped by Muslim gangs who specialize in 'grooming' young British females, some as young as ten, by plying them with drugs and alcohol and then pass them around from house to house and even from town to town. The British National Party alerted the Establishment to this degradation of young white females in 2002, but was soon hounded into silence by a willing media who plays the Establishment's tune and it wasn't until the EDL began to expose the sordid Muslim gangs and their grooming methods to a wider public audience, that the Establishment were forced to act against this cultural jihad being waged on their own people by an imported people who practice an ideology called Islam, an ideology that is the complete antithesis to the values of a Western nation!
A greater act of treachery by the British Establishment there has never been!
Many Western writers since the advent of 9/11 have now exposed the criminality of the imported Muslim who is over represented in all jails in all Western lands. The collective criminality of Muslims should have been the death knell for the nation destroying policy of multiculturalism and its fascist enforcer, political correctness, which were both dreamed up in that denizen of moral decay, the United Nations.
Yet it is still being embraced by all Western nations!
Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll were co-founders of the EDL and had until October, 2013, led the EDL through many towns and cities, always with police approval and always peacefully. That of course has not stopped the Muslims and their co-conspirators, Unite Against Fascism (UAF) the Socialist Alliance and other Left Wing socialist groups from trying to disrupt the EDL marches through intimidation tactics or outright assault against the members by hurling any handy missiles, such as bricks and bottles onto the marchers, or infiltrating the EDL and attacking police during the marches.
Who pays these mobs to practice their violence?
The media have always taken the side of UAF and their allies, even though there is ample evidence that places any trouble caused at those marches squarely with the Socialists and Fascists (UAF) – and the UAF is a fascist organization which is so very obvious to anyone who knows their history and how the fascists and Nazis used/use violent methods to get their way.
So the cards are well and truly stacked against the EDL especially with the recent controversial resignations of Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon) and Kevin Carroll to which the Establishment had hoped the EDL now lacking popular leaders would disintegrate, but which does not appear to be the case at this time of writing. However, that could change after the weekend (October 12) march in Bradford and the handling of the EDL by local police who receive their orders indirectly from the Establishment.
While the EDL have surprised the British Establishment with how quickly the movement spread and how effective it is still in polarizing public opinion in its favor, the EDL, to this author's thinking at least, have been letting those down who know what it is they are up against when taking on the 'colonization' of their own land, and the Establishment, the media and police who are openly protecting those whose job it is to 'colonize'.
The author wishes to point out and criticize five policies the EDL has as its mission statement, and they are;
1. Human Rights - Well doesn't the Magna Carta, and the English Bill of Rights along with the law of the land - common law, guarantee everyone's rights who is a British citizen? Why take a UN inspired policy which was never meant for highly evolved Western nations and run with it when Britain is one of those nations in which basic equality under the law was first enacted? Was this included just to appease the EDL members, or the Establishments sensibility?
2. Democracy, rule of law and oppose Sharia? Wouldn't oppose fundamentalist Islam make more sense? How will the EDL uphold democracy and the rule of law when those opposed to them are not playing by the same rules?
3. Public Education to give a more balanced picture of Islam? The only picture of Islam that the public should see is the REAL Islam which is the complete antithesis to that which the EDL are supposed to uphold. The REAL Islam is on display around the world and in individual nations that have accepted large numbers of Muslims as immigrants 24/7 to those who are willing to see and accept it. The EDL is fighting Islam and that means through necessity, that NO Muslims should be members.
4. Respecting tradition, but openly embracing the best that other cultures can offer? Who gets to consider what is the best from any culture? What part of Islam would be worth accepting as the best? What part of Indian/Pakistani culture would be considered the best? Why is this crap about respecting tradition being put forward when the only culture that Islam respects is Islamic and the only tradition that should be respected is the British tradition?
5. International outlook – working with other nations? How is that achieved when some of those nations have banned the EDL from marching in them?
The author believes the above 'mission statement' is naïve at best and just plain cloud cuckoo land stuff at worst because it is not Islamic extremism that the EDL are marching against, it is Islamic Fundamentalism they are fighting which needs to be recognized. When one is taking the fight up to those who are trying to destroy the place in which you were born and raised and have grown to love, then airy fairy crap like that 'mission statement' is completely out of place and unworkable until the country you are fighting to preserve has been restored to what it once was.
The EDL hierarchy need to drastically re-think their mission statement if they are to survive and they need to discard the multiculti crap that has pervaded and distorted their thinking. They are English first and foremost and England is the land they are fighting to protect. Everything else, including those who wish to join in, come second place to what must be done to reclaim Britain from those who are slowly destroying it. The EDL must also become political, they must register their movement as a political party which the Establishment will then find very difficult to undermine and intimidate individual members as they have done with Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
It’s Fundamentalism, stupid!
Islamic Terrorism has been with us for some time now, in fact, ever since Islam came onto the scene around 1400 years ago Islam has been making its presence felt wherever it has been forcefully spread – unlike Christianity which has largely been propagated through peaceful conversion. It may not be widely spoken of today due to the actions of history revisionists and their deceitful ways, but the Crusades of the middle ages were in direct response to the occupation of the Holy Land by Muslim hordes and the Muslim bandits who took to attacking the undefended Christian Pilgrims on their way to the Holy Land while Islam systematically turned Jewish religious symbols, such as the Dome on the Rock, into Muslim shrines or that religious perversion and symbol of conquest, a Mosque.
The Mosque is not a Church or a Temple as Westerners understand a religious building to be. The Mosque is the indoctrination center of the Muslims where, especially in infidel lands, political and social directions are given to the Muslim ummah for them to faithfully follow under Allah's directions to overcome the infidel in his own land.
But back to some basic history;
After Mohammed's death, the plague that is Islam spread its disease throughout the Mediterranean via Islamic Jihad, systematically conquering and destroying, and through the ultimatum of life or death converting the inhabitants of those lands which had once been part of the Roman Empire – it has now been shown that those once Roman cities on the shores of the Mediterranean, such as Timgad in Algeria, once thought to have been destroyed through earthquake were in fact razed by the forces of Islam. Countries we now know as Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Cyprus all came under lslamic control and influence. Islam then spread to the southern aspects of Europe where countries we now know as Turkey, Croatia, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Albania and Romania, all fell under Islam's onslaught.
History shows that many tribes, such as the Visigoths, the Vandals, the Vikings and the Mongols that wreaked havoc and destruction across their path eventually assimilated into the lands they conquered, but the one tribe that will never assimilate into those lands it migrates to or conquers, and will not rest until the whole world becomes subject to it, is Islam, and for evidentiary purposes, there are these historical precedents;
The Islamic practice of Jihad - the only so called religion that makes its propagation obligatory on every believer whether through proselytizing or by force - was first put into a wholesale military onslaught now known as the First Great Jihad which was defeated not far from present day Paris at the battle of Poitiers/Tours in 732.
The Second Great Jihad was stopped at the gates of Vienna in 1638.
It is becoming clear that we are now in the throes of the Third Great Jihad which our Western governments continue to not recognize, but the many thinkers within the West are waking up to. The Third Jihad kicked off when the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem began holding hands with Adolf Hitler who arranged for whole Muslim companies of German outfitted soldiers to wreak havoc in the Balkans, particularly against the Christians and the Communists. It is well established thought, that victims have long memories and the Balkans conflict flared again during the early 1990's after the financial collapse of the Soviet system. Western indifference (deliberate?) also played its part, but mostly it was brought about through political meddling, and has yet to have its end game as there are many scores to be settled by both sides.
This author once asked a work colleague, whose background is Serbian, during the Balkans conflict what the problem was – his simple answer has stayed with the author ever since – 'they are Muslims!'
When Israel came into existence by United Nations Charter in 1948 the Arab/Islamic world rebelled which found favor among the displaced - by their own choosing - the so called 'Palestinians' who chose en-masse to not share Israel with the Jews and migrated to Jordan where they were eventually kicked out from after soiling their own nest through terrorist activities. The 'pallies' whose 'national front' organization, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) began hijacking commercial airliners during the mid-1960's, and killing 'Jews' at European airports. They then graduated with their most outrageous and heinous act by killing 12 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972. This scum of the earth then eventually drifted off into Lebanon to which their 'cultural contribution' is now a testament for the non-Islamic world to appreciate.
The PLO was led by the Islamic Terrorist, Yasser Arafat, who twice abrogated his responsibility to his own people to sign a peace accord with Israel while refusing to have a Palestinian state, as recognized by the United Nations and Israel, because it meant the Palestinians would have to live side by side with Israeli's to whom the Palestinians and Hamas vow – in fact, this vow is written into their Charter- to kill all Jews and annihilate Israel.
Now you know why the Nazi's and Islam hit it off so well together!
Ever since the Second World War, and with rare exception, Western political/ideological/selfish ambitions have taken first and foremost preference over patriotism to one's own nation which has given every Western nation the Islamic menace now living within our borders and to which our security agencies have to work full time to stop, but usually at best, only mitigate the Islamic terrorist networks and their barbarous acts of terror.
The Barbarians are inside the Western gate but no political authority is willing to acknowledge this plain and simple truth, and it seems to be only a problem to a handful of observers who are willing to identify and accept the clear and present danger that is Islam.
Is this because;
1. Multiculturalism and its fascist enforcer, Political Correctness, are blinding those who are in positions of power to act?
2. Those who have the ability to comprehend the threat and are in positions of authority to act have either been compromised to not act and have therefore become willing dupes in this conspiracy to undermine the West, are moral cowards too afraid and too selfish to 'rattle the cage' due to lack of intestinal fortitude or are being shouted down by their own peers?
Whatever the reason or reasons, the symptoms of how they think are always readily on public display. Nothing to see here folks, just move along and everything will be OK!
Well everything is not OK! And the author will make a point about the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO) and the lack of comprehension by that organization as to what it is exactly we are fighting on a GLOBAL level when it comes to Islamic Terrorism. This is a war not yet publicly recognized between two civilizations, the West and Islam, and it is a war that is currently being played down (Afghanistan being a prime example) by our elected representatives who are supposed to be working for US!
And on not being publicly recognized as a war between two old enemies, this must now be stated;
The Head spook of ASIO, David Irvine, recently presented a speech on terrorism that was highlighted by the noted columnist and blogger, Andrew Bolt, in his blog yesterday, October 2/2013, and to which the author gained some insight into how a chief spy thinks about Islamic terrorism. In this chief spy's opinion there is, 'No single profile of the Islamic Terrorist'.
What!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He then goes on to emphasize that acts of Islamic Terrorism are being perpetrated by individuals or groups who hold, now get this, 'extremist views of Islam.'
What!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So this is the kind of thinking that permeates throughout the 'establishment'! You can just imagine the 'establishment' running off to the Iman to ask the question; Why do these Muslims carry out acts of barbarism, you are the religion of peace after all, so what gives?
Have those who would beat a path to the Iman's door to ask such an absurd question, and as part of their mandatory responsibility to protect the citizenry from such attacks, even bothered to read just a few lines of the Qu'ran?
Also, one must wonder at the naivety or the criminality of being a willing dupe, when asking those questions of a dangerous enemy if they would have, at another time in history, asked the Nazi's why it is was that they were so murderously violent toward the Jews and had the ambition to conquer the world.
What Irvine has missed, either deliberately or naively when raising questions about Islamic Terrorism, is that there is an obvious thread recognized by those who have studied Islam and a thread that runs through every terrorist attack committed by Muslims worldwide, and that thread is Islam and the Qu'ran. Those Muslims who take up jihad against the infidel by either fighting or committing acts of terror against them are doing what Islam and the Qu'ran dictate. They are not extremists who have taken the teachings of Islam and perverted them as some Muslims, or their Western dhimmis would have us believe, they are FUNDAMENTALISTS who are acting out what is dictated to them through the Qu'ran and from their indoctrination centers, the Mosque, in all Western lands.
Islam teaches that FUNDAMENTALISM is an obligation on all those who follow Islam, and that is why Islam is such a dangerous enemy to an inattentive Western Civilization.
Monday, September 30, 2013
The Comrades
Marxism is like an out of control cancer – it spreads everywhere it can take hold and eventually destroys the host, the host being in this case, any ordered democratic society that by its own limitations in exerting its right to exist through the people elected to defend it, eventually succumbs, at first to the seemingly reasonable demands to change, which when once gained, soon gather momentum into the outrageous subversion and perversion of all that is good and has been proven over time to work for cohesiveness and stability within that society.
What is now left of all Western nations which still retain some evidence of democracy is now being slowly white-anted away by the inroads made into all our institutions by the Communist/Socialist/Progressive elite who planned for this eventual outcome over 100 years ago. It is a plan that did not include the consensus of those who would be shunted aside by the arranged 'Long March' through our institutions, and because the system of communism would be rejected out of hand by any person given a real education instead of what passes for education today, this plan had to be covertly in favor of those whose political leanings were found to be sympathetic to the Comrade cause!
Hollywood has played, and continues to play a major role in the 'Long March' which is really just now beginning to be fully understood, a prime example being the anti-American, anti-Western themed movies of recent times.
A person who has had her finger firmly on the pulse of what has been allowed to occur within our threadbare democracies and is also a champion of democracy who has known the utter bastardry, vitriol and sheer vindictiveness, ad- hominem attacks and slander that only the Comrades can dish out while they themselves scream offense, play the victim or racist card-whenever some hard questions are directed their way, is Diana West, whose recent contribution to the under the radar cultural war that very few of us 'thinkers' realize is actually happening, is the book titled, American Betrayal.
I won't go into what the book is about only to say that Ms West raises some very interesting points concerning American involvement with Soviet Russia, World War 2 and the Cold War, which in any nation that still has some national self- respect must lead to questions being asked as to how the United States was infiltrated by the Comrades many, many decades ago, and what little has been done to counter the infiltration whenever real concerns are or were raised, and for example, Senator Joe McCarthy's so called 'Communist Witch hunt' during the 1950's that should have had alarm bells ringing everywhere within Congress and the media, but didn't!
Instead, the American Patriot McCarthy was ostracized, and through constant and slanderous attacks by the Comrades, then became demonized!
You have to hand it to the Comrades - they know how to quickly shaft their enemies!
America is now at that stage of national degradation that we have borne witness to the spectacle of an American president being completely humiliated by his Russian counterpart over the fiasco that is Syria, while the talking heads and the media barely raised a question as to what went wrong.
And too, unlike Obama, at least the KGB trained Putin puts his country first!
Now back to Ms West and her book, American Betrayal. It may come as no surprise to some of us that the Comrades have put the attack dogs onto Ms West for daring to raise a valid subject, the subordination of her country to a system that has a proven history of human tragedy that no previous system throughout recorded human history has ever been able to bring about. The fact that the Comrades now disguise their agenda by calling themselves Socialists or Progressives or Greens, instead of what they truly are, Communists, should give pause to the thinker still assessing his/her world view.
And it is for this uncovering to their agenda that Ms West now becomes subject to the Comrades attacks to discredit, not only her recent book, but her reputation as well.
It came as a shock to this author that David Horowitz of Front Page Magazine, a self- styled anti-jihadist who has been very persistent in exposing the danger that is Islam, has taken up the fight against Ms West's book and personally attacked her through some very unsavory innuendo. It now seems that the David Horowitz's and others who have come out of the woodwork to 'have a go' at Ms West now have some explaining to do about their personal political preferences and biases.
Those of us who lauded David Horowitz for his stand against Islam now must re-assess what it is exactly that Horowitz and those who have now joined in Horowitz's chorus against Ms West consider their long term agenda and goals.
And some hard questions must now be asked of those who have allowed the Comrades to gain such a foothold!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)